Playbooks·HR / People·Professional Services·HR16

Compensation Review Cycle Analysis

Extract compensation data, compare against benchmarks and equity signals, and produce budget-validated adjustment recommendations.

GenAI impact

What this playbook delivers

Projected against the same workflow run manually, end to end

60%
Faster than the manual baseline
~9.2hrs
Saved per cycle
3
Source-of-truth artifacts

Estimated impact based on 15 employees in a single compensation review cycle · Real savings vary with team volume and current process maturity

The challenge

Why the workflow breaks

Three patterns show up across teams using GenAI without a shared workflow

Input reconciliation

Compensation teams have to reconcile performance packs, pay records, benchmarks, equity guidelines, role levels, tenure, budget parameters, and prior-cycle context before recommendations are traceable.

Equity blindspots

Pay gaps or inconsistent adjustments may be missed when benchmark comparison and equity checks happen separately.

Rationale gaps

Adjustment recommendations create risk when the reasoning cannot be traced to data, budget, and review criteria.

Where GenAI helps

From confused intake to source-of-truth artifacts

Here’s what changes when the team uses this playbook

  • Compensation data is cleaned ad hoc

    Compensation Data Extract establishes the review set

  • Benchmarks are checked in separate files

    Benchmark Comparison Matrix structures market context

  • Equity issues surface late

    Equity Gap Analysis flags patterns before recommendations

  • Recommendations lack a defensible explanation

    Compensation Recommendation Rationale documents the basis

How the playbook works

3 phases, one source of truth

Each phase produces an artifact the next phase builds on

1

Extract data

AI structures the Compensation Data Extract so review inputs are consistent before benchmark or equity analysis.

2

Compare benchmarks

The workflow creates a Benchmark Comparison Matrix and Equity Gap Analysis for human review of market and internal signals.

3

Validate recommendations

Draft Adjustment Recommendations become Budget-Validated Recommendations with a Compensation Recommendation Rationale.

What you’ll produce

Sample artifacts from the workflow

Interim and final deliverables you can review and download

Benchmark Comparison Matrix

Employee-level benchmark comparison with compa-ratios, position flags, and summary counts before equity analysis.

AiOS · HR16 · Step 1
Download Sample PDF

Equity Gap Analysis

Outlier and peer-equity gap analysis tied to internal thresholds, severity, and compensation risk notes.

AiOS · HR16 · Step 2
Download Sample PDF

Compensation Recommendation Rationale

Anonymized recommendation rationale tying proposed adjustments to benchmark position, internal equity flags, budget constraints, and approval logic.

AiOS · HR16 · Step 5
Download Sample PDF

Built into the workflow

Quality and risk checks at every step

Verification, data handling, and definition-of-done rules are part of the playbook — not afterthoughts

Quality

Structured compa-ratio templates and step-by-step evidence-chain prompts ensure every employee receives benchmark comparison against identical criteria, eliminating the inconsistent ad-hoc analysis that occurs when analysts manually review compensation data under time pressure.

Risk handling

Enforced anonymization-before-prompting steps and data warnings prevent individual salary figures and employee identifiers from being pasted into public GenAI tools, mitigating the PII leakage risk inherent in ungoverned Shadow AI compensation analysis.

LIVE ONLINE LABS

Join a live Lab for this workflow

An AGASI expert runs your team through the Compensation Review Cycle Analysis workflow on your own real work — so you leave with the method, not a recording.

  • Built around this exact playbook

    You internalise the method, not a recording.

  • Facilitated by an AGASI expert

    Live online coaching on prompts, verification, and where the workflow tends to break.

  • Public or private formats

    Join an open public Lab, or bring it in-house for your team.

I'm interested in

Get started

Run the Compensation Review Cycle Analysis playbook

Step-by-step prompts, role guidance, data-handling notes, and definition-of-done checks for every step of the workflow